|
WINTER 2002 ISSUE
National Plan for Lymphoedema gets underway Progress at Framework Conference held on 18 April 2002 This conference brought together over 130 people from a diverse range of backgrounds (patients, NHS and independent professional practitioners, managers at all levels, academics and industry) from across the country to work on:
This distillation of the day and its work is based on the outputs from a structured half day workshop using the experiences and reading of the Conference Transcript document by the randomly chosen members of the Write-Up Group, with Christine Moffatt, Anita Wallace, Sheila Damon and John Mitchell. These are the recollections of participants, using their own language: The atmosphere was remarkable. There was energy, a buzz, a real sense of passion. The organisation and the design of the event just flowed. It was very engaging. At the beginning it seemed unlikely that there would be enough to keep us there for the whole day; by the second part of the morning it felt impossible to leave. There was ample opportunity to talk about our own experience and knowledge - but there was also a great deal to learn from others.We went on exchanging and developing ideas all day. The way we were asked to work together was a great leveller. No one felt more or less important than anyone else. One of us remembers early in the day being in a small group with a Chief Executive Officer (CEO), a surgeon and a patient. The surgeon and the CEO were clearly listening to and learning from the patient. This was a new experience for us all. It seemed as if everyone went on enhancing their understanding throughout the day. People left feeling very positive. Although it became apparent that the size of the problem is daunting - potentially overwhelming - we were left with enthusiasm, commitment and considerable unity in a sense of potential for action and a need both to learn from the past and create new ways of doing things. This distillation draws on the Conference Transcript Document and the reflections and discussions of participants. It is organised according to the structure of the day. (i) From Here to the Future: Setting the Scene Drawing on the wealth of knowledge and experience in the room, the essence of the problems at the moment is:
The first part of the morning focused on the sharing of perspectives and experiences. From that foundation, the second part of the morning looked at the characteristics of desirable and feasible future states. There was considerable consistency across the conference about what is needed.Whilst things are fragmented and patchy at the moment, it is heartening that where things are in place they are usually working well. There are good existing models to be built on and learnt from. The British Lymphology Society (BLS) and Lymphoedema Support Network (LSN) have much to offer. Therapists of all disciplines are generally enthusiastic and committed. Overall people want to see comprehensive, holistic services available on an equitable basis through the NHS. This means that, whilst private practitioners may well continue to contribute, services should be available free at the point of delivery, and access should not be dependent upon individual ability to pay. There needs to be work to develop an evidence base and to promote treatment found to be effective through research, including patient experience. Strong partnerships between patients as experts, services, industry and researchers should be fostered. The conference itself has made an excellent start on this process. Education needs to raise the awareness of lymphoedema and its profile, whilst also working to create enough trained and accredited staff. (iii) Issues for Further Work Before lunch there was a brainstorming session to identify issues for further work, it generated an amazing buzz: the ideas just kept on coming. They ranged from a focus on getting the basics right through to beginning to create an ideal world. Key areas included:
In the afternoon, participants chose an issue to work on in parallel with colleagues. They discussed the issue, identifying key points, and then went on to consider recommendations and actions. In a busy market-place exercise, everyone had the opportunity to review and cross-fertilise with each other's work. Some of the most striking findings are distilled below. There is a need for both general and specialist education. Public awareness should also be developed. The conference worked up a number of exciting and practical approaches. There should also be continued work to inform patients as well as to influence funding decisions. At the same time, professional education and training should build the capacity to recognise lymphoedema and know what services are available. There is also a need to develop better specialist training, development and support, whilst continuously building the evidence base.We need to be working towards accredited training on a multi-disciplinary basis backed up by published research, both qualitative and quantitative. This must include patient experiences and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness measures should include what matters to patients. Lymphoedema specialists come from a wide range of backgrounds and bring a plethora of valuable perspectives. It is vital to ensure they link up and are able to benefit from sharing experience and ideas. There should be recognition of the differing needs of specialist sub-groups - e.g. children with lymphoedema and their parents. Partnerships with industry can help to ensure that the products which work for people are more readily and consistently available. Industry is very keen to work with patients, professionals and researchers. There remain the problems and challenges of getting NHS funding for what patients need. These partnerships can also help to share and disseminate knowledge from a variety of sources and perspectives to mutual benefit. Patient liaison groups should be integral to research, education and service delivery. It is vital that services are developed which are available on an equitable basis and to which access does not depend on postcode lottery nor on aetiology. Services should be local, patient sensitive and involving and supportive of patients. There should be better focus on getting delivery to the point of need. In the changing NHS, close working with Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) is going to be fundamental. There should be a core of knowledge within each PCT. Knowledge about which services should be provided together with ideas about workable frameworks and models for service delivery need to be developed and disseminated across the country. The needs of lymphoedema patients need to be recognised explicitly, both locally (via PCTs) and nationally. Policies for lymphoedema need to have much higher priority. At a very practical level, compression therapy must be made available across primary and secondary care and hosiery, bandages and garments need to be available at NHS rates. Even whilst working on researching and creating new service models and fleshing out existing frameworks, we do know enough about what is wanted to make a start at improving things right away. All our developments give us scope for further learning from real experience, on an iterative basis. (v) In Conclusion The Conference worked on a very large number of the identified issues. The Transcript demonstrates that they are all facets of the same problem. It was striking how much it focussed on real patient needs throughout. Balancing the perspectives and interests of patients, professionals, managers and the general public, and recognising the potential in partnerships with industry are pivotal to success. It is vital to push for progress without creating unrealisable expectations. Most Important Messages All patients with lymphoedema need to know about their condition, to be aware of what should be available and to have equitable access to effective services and support. GPs' awareness and knowledge base must improve. Likewise with other health care professionals, whether generic or specialist. National awareness for the general public, for policy-makers and for funders must be increased. Lymphoedema care must not be a matter of aetiology or postcode. |
|
AUTUMN 2002 ISSUE Support Group battles for Lymphoedema patients with help from Women's Institute Joyce Armin, a lymphoedema patient and LSN member from Somerset is determined to overcome lymphoedema and ensure her painful journey in accessing treatment is minimised for fellow patients. Joyce writes about her personal battle and how she has enlisted the help of the Women’s Institute in raising government awareness of the condition; an excellent example of local campaigning for better lymphoedema care. I feel very honoured to be asked by the LSN to write an article for LymphLine to inform you of the progress that is being made in the Somerset area. I would also like to highlight the reasons for my determination to spread the awareness of lymphoedema.
|
|
AUTUMN 2002 ISSUE Thirteen Miles or Bust By Russell Mellor It all began on Sunday July 22 last year. That was the day after our wedding, and most of the wedding party had gone out for a celebratory meal. Towards the end of the meal our best man stated that he thought he should start doing a bit of running to get fit. The rest of us had a big laugh at this (he isn't the sportiest of people), and then for some reason the moment got the better of me. I suggested that we could all start running, giving each other morale support, and that we could aim for some sort of goal. This idea actually went down relatively well, and before I knew it there were seven of us going to do the Great North Run in Newcastle on October 6 2002 (it should be said that my best man rapidly changed his mind about running, and was not included). The Great North Run is a half marathon (just over 13 miles) around the city and hills (that's the bit I don't like) of Newcastle. After agreeing to do it, our thoughts changed to who we were going to raise money for, and I decided that I would try to get sponsorship for the Lymphoedema Support Network. At this point I should probably explain a little bit about who I am, and why I want to raise money for the LSN. I am 26 years old, and part of the Dermatology unit at St George's Hospital Medical School, headed by Professor Peter Mortimer, where we are doing research into secondary lymphoedema that can occur following treatment for breast cancer (breast cancer related lymphoedema - BCRL). I am coming to the end of a PhD on BCRL, and over the course of our ongoing studies we have been helped by many volunteers, both with and without BCRL, coming forward to take part in our research. The LSN has been of particular help by running adverts asking for volunteers, to which many women responded, and without which the research would not have been possible. I therefore felt that we had a debt of gratitude to both the women who volunteered and the LSN, and decided that if I was going to be stupid enough to try and run 13 miles, that I should at least do it for a good cause and give a little back to the people who have helped us. Therefore, the training has now started (which is definitely hard work and sometimes I think that our best man had the right idea about not doing it) and there is a little under 3 months to go. My wife, Sally, has also decided that she should get sponsored for the LSN, so hopefully we will be able to raise a reasonable amount. I know that during the run (and the training) the thought that it all goes towards a good cause will definitely help to keep the tired legs moving. If you would like to sponsor me for the LSN then please contact the LSN and give them your details along with how much you are willing to sponsor me (or Sally, or both of us) and hopefully together we can raise some money for the LSN and move forward in lymphoedema support and understanding. |
|
SUMMER 2002 ISSUE Key project underway with London Primary Care Trust News from the Lymphoedema Framework Project By Professors Christine Moffatt & Peter Franks, Centre for Research
We are delighted to report a further key project in collaboration with the Lymphoedema Support Network, which will help achieve national recognition of the condition and its treatment. The last year has been an immensely exciting and rewarding time following the epidemiology study that we reported in LymphLine last year (see Winter 2001 issue). Since then, we have managed to secure research funding from a prestigious grantgiving body, the Kings Fund, who fund major projects that will improve the health care of Londoners. The King’s Fund is an important "Think Tank" concerned with health and social care, and is highly influential in informing health policy in the UK. Additional major funding has also been secured from a consortium of companies who produce products such as hosiery and bandaging for lymphoedema care. The project is particularly important because it is a collaboration with key stake holders, such as the LSN, who are working in partnership with us to ensure that the research reflects the real needs of patients. The project also benefits from collaboration with the British Lymphology Society who have already done much work in this field, and the support of Wandsworth Primary Care Trust where part of the research will be undertaken. What is the project trying to achieve? Work of the LSN and BLS has highlighted that services to patients with lymphoedema are disjointed and in some cases do not exist. Care is based largely on the underlying cause of the lymphoedema, with many patients with primary lymphoedema having no access to treatment. There is a clear need for a co-ordinated approach to care which allows for services which are sensitive to the patients’ needs and reflect the governments agenda of providing care within a defined geographical area, called a primary care trust (PCT). This led us to develop the following research project. The aim of the project is to use a process of consultation and partnership with professionals, care providers and the LSN, to develop, implement and evaluate a model of care for patients with lymphoedema within Wandsworth PCT. Part of this project will involve a wider consultation process, so that the information can be used to develop services nationally. How will we achieve our aims? The model will focus on the delivery of lymphoedema services within Wandsworth PCT which provides care for 260,000 patients in London. The overall study will use a number of implementation methods and will have three stages, comprising an evaluation of current care, development of the new service during which all patients will be treated, and an evaluation of the effect of the new service. With current provision of care focussed through hospitals, patients often have to reach a stage of having a complicated lymphoedema before treatment is made available.Many of these patients may have reached this stage because of lack of early intervention leading to further deterioration and worsening of their condition. Developing an effective service will focus on ensuring early intervention, through the development of skills and knowledge in existing community staff such as GPs, community and practice nurses, and carers in social care settings. This will allow for the appropriate use of specialist lymphoedema support services that can be flexibly used according to where the patient needs to be treated. The LSN has emphasised the need for providing easy access to treatment. This proposed approach to lymphoedema management might have important long-term consequences for the cost and effectiveness of care delivery. The project should reduce the numbers of patients suffering complications such as acute infections leading to hospital admission. In addition, effective care should help prevent some of the psychological distress associated with the condition. Correct treatment will help to prevent health deterioration and reliance on health services and social care. Of central importance to this project is the belief that effective care will improve quality of life for the many sufferers of this condition. What are we looking to evaluate? The design of the project allows for comprehensive evaluation of a wide range of outcomes as well as providing evidence for whether this approach to care delivery should be adopted on a wider national scale. Part of this process will be undertaken by a researcher employed by the LSN who will evaluate throughout the project the patient experience of the disease, and the care being provided at different stages. Other important health outcomes will be measured including the cost effectiveness of providing the new service. Where are we now? During the last six months we have been working to design the framework for consultation with a number of working groups:
These groups meet regularly, and patients are represented in all working groups, with the consultation group being joint-chaired by Anita Wallace, Chair of the LSN, and Professor Christine Moffatt. By working with all partners we expect that this project will define the standard of care required for all services within the UK. First participative consensus conference On the 18th April 2002 the project was formally launched with our first consensus conference for which 160 people attended, including 20 invited patients together with the LSN Trustees. In a later edition of LymphLine we will summarise the findings from this conference, which was praised by the attendees. Helen Walley, Chief Executive of Wandsworth PCT described the conference as ‘extremely important’ in starting the process of change. Taking the work forward We are delighted to be able to report that Ealing PCT and Hounslow PCT are also working with us to develop similar services based on these recommendations, and we hope, that within the next 18 months, to be working with a number of other sites. We would like to thank the LSN for their continued support, enthusiasm and encouragement to continue when things have been difficult. You are an inspiration to us! |
|
SPRING 2002 ISSUE An anniversary to be proud of LSN members come from far and wide to toast ten years of progress. Anita Wallace, LSN Chair, was warm in her praise and appreciation of guests, members and helpers alike during her welcoming address at the LSN's Tenth Anniversary celebration last November at the Royal Marsden Hospital where the charity was founded in 1991. Paying particular regard to Professor Peter Mortimer, the LSN's principal medical authority, she said that the charity's high level of professional excellence that had made the LSN's information service one of the best in the world could never have been achieved without his help and guidance and that of the many other health care professionals who had helped the LSN over the years. She also praised the efforts of the past and present Trustees, volunteers and staff for the high degree of devotion and energy with which they had tackled the many demands made upon them. She said that the LSN wished to express its thanks to all the members for their continuing support and also thanked the members who had come from places as far apart as Ireland and the Isle of Wight for their presence, in what was an important landmark in the history of the charity. Anita went on to extend a special welcome to Marion Myers, Eileen Veasey and Jean Price, founder members who were present and also to Lymphoedema Sister Sian Thomason and Lymphoedema Specialist Eunice Jeffs who had helped to set up the LSN. She then introduced the two speakers, Professors Mortimer and Moffatt and congratulated LSN supporter Dorothy Jones for her superb anniversary cake, which was cut with ceremony and enjoyed by all.
|
|
SPRING 2002 ISSUE £600,000 funding breakthrough for S.W. London research underlines LSN progress in last decade Following so soon after the LSN's 10th Anniversary celebration at the Royal Marsden Hospital, the recent announcement by Professors Moffatt and Franks that they had secured major funding to finance a key second national development phase for their original South West London Pilot Study,* represents a resounding success in the overall campaign to improve lymphoedema services in Britain. It also underlines the progress we have all made since the early days in 1991 when the LSN's membership was not the 2000 it is now but just the seven original founder members! *See LymphLine Winter 2001 issue. |